He also decides Caterpillar provides better service and has more knowledgeable and responsive staff. Finally, he places higher value on Caterpillar’s corporate image and reputation. He adds up all the benefits from product, services, people, and image, and perceives Caterpillar as delivering greater customer benefits.
The buyer also examines his total cost of transacting with Caterpillar versus Komatsu, includ-ing time, energy, and psychological costs expended in product acquisition, usage, maintenance, ownership, and disposal. Then he considers whether Caterpillar’s total customer cost is too high compared to total customer benefits. If it is, he might choose Komatsu. The buyer will choose whichever source delivers the highest perceived value.
In this situation, Caterpillar can improve its offer in three ways.
- First, it can increase total customer benefit by improving economic, functional, and psychological benefits of its product, services, people, and/or image.
- Second, it can reduce the buyer’s time, energy, and psychological investment.
- Third, it can reduce its product’s monetary cost to the buyer.